The paper analyses the main technical and economic elementsof the cwrent European rail freight market and presentsthe basic concepts of possible new technologies in the railfreight system. They would enable the railways to enter the morerewarding niches of the freight transport market. In an attemptto understand better the problems of introducing innovationsinto the transport sector this paper also considers the theoreticalframework and analyses the implementation paths of the proposedtechnological innovations. New technologies are confrontedwith various barriers and difficulties created by the existingand dominant technological paradigms. These are oftenpoweiful enough to prevent the introduction of alternatives andpromising innovations. The empirical part of the paper focuseson the possibilities of combining the existing innovative railfreight technologies which could, with the appropriate organizationalsolutions (time-tables) and political support, increasethe competitiveness of the rail freight transport in new andpromising market segments.
(1] Thalmann (2000): The Dynamics of Freight Transport
Development. Explanations and Perspectives. Swiss National
Science Foundation, Research Programme 41,
'Transport and Environment', Bern.
(2] Eufranet, http://europa.eu.int/comm/transport/extra/
final_ repo rts/rail/eu franet. pdf
Tietze, W. & M. L. Steinmann-Tietze (2001): Tasks
Facing European Transp01t Policy in the 21' Centwy, in:
PRO MET Vol. 13, No. 2-3, pp. 65-75
Mortimer, P. N. & R. Palacin & A. M. Robinson (2003):
Innovative small self-propelled freight trains - TruckTrain
®, Advanced Railway Research Centre, Sheffield
S14DP
Schliephake, K. ( 2001): Passenger Transport in GeJmany-
Transportation Systems in Competition, in: Promet
Vol. 13, No. 2. -3, pp. 187- 198
Bukold, S. (1996) Kombinierter Verkehr Schiene/Strasse
in Europa. Eine vergleichende Studie zur Transformation
von Giitertransportsystemen, Frankfurt.
Bozicnik, S. (2004): Current Road Pricing Policies in EU
New Accession Countries, in: Wuerzburger Geographische
Manuskripte Vol. 66, pp. 129-141
Rude!, R. (2001 ): Leapfrog innovations in the intermodal
road- rail haul industry, Conference Paper STRC 2001.
(9] EO-Commission Directive No. 91/440, 29 July 1991
(10] Promotiq (1999): http://www.gruppoclas.it/
PROMOTIQ/P website/workandpubblications/
Deliverable1Promotiq. doe
Giibler, A. (1990) The rise and fall of infrastJuctures,
Berlin.
Nelson, R. R. & S. G. Winter (1983): The Rise and Fall
of Infrastructures. Berlin.
(13] Dosi, G. (1982): Technological paradigms and technological
trajectories: a suggested inte1pretation of the determinants
of technological change, in: Research Policy, Vol.
, pp. 147-162
Bijker, W. E. & T. P. Hughes & T. J. Pinch (1987): The
social construction of technological systems, Cam bridge,
MA, MIT Press.
(15] IRIS (2001): Innovative Rail Intermodal Services, Final
Report for Publication, June 2001
(16] Idioma: www.ldioma.gr
The TruckTrain Experience (2000): Paper presented at
Manchester Metropolitan University, Rail Freight Vehicle
Conference, April 2000.
(18] Nijkamp, P. (Eds, 1996): Telemarics and Transport Behaviour.
Berlin & Heidelberg.
Market needs beyond rail freight vehicle innovation- The
need for a joined up railway. Paper presented at Manchester
Metropolitan University Rail Freight Vehicle
Conference, April 2001.
Guest Editor: Eleonora Papadimitriou, PhD
Editors: Dario Babić, PhD; Marko Matulin, PhD; Marko Ševrović, PhD.
The mission of our journal is to provide high quality communication of research results, which is crucial for the effectiveness of scientific research, the promotion of scientific information, new ideas, and original research in the field of traffic and transportation engineering.
1848-4069
0353-5320
Proud publisher
Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science |
2024 © Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal
