This paper proposes a new hybrid evaluation method including Improved Analytic Hierarchy Process (IAHP), Entropy Method (EM), and Grey Comprehensive Evaluation Method (GCEM) to assess the transfer efficiency between rail transit and public bicycles. In particular, the IAHP method that replaces the nine-scale approach with three-scale approach to naturally meet the consistency requirements is applied to qualitatively calculate the weights of evaluation indices, the EM method is utilized to calculate the weights of evaluation indices with relatively high degrees of quantification, and the GCEM method is used to calculate the transfer efficiency between rail transit and public bicycles. In addition, a three-level evaluation-index system including target level, criteria level and index level is established. A numerical example is also provided to verify the feasibility of the proposed hybrid evaluation method and explore the reasons for low transfer efficiency between rail transit and public bicycles.
Krykewycz RG, Puchalsky MC, Rocks J, Bonnette B, Jaskiewicz F. Defining a primary market and estimating demand for major bicycle-sharing program in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2010; 2143: 117-124. Available from: doi:10.3141/2143-15
Doolittle JT, Porter EK. Integration of bicycles and transit national academy press. Washington, DC; 1994.
Martens K. The bicycle as a feedering mode: experiences from three European countries. Transportation Research part D: Transport and Environment. 2004;9(4): 281-294. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.trd.2004.02.005
Martens K. Promoting bike-and-ride: the Dutch experience. Transportation Research part A: Policy and Practice. 2007;41(4): 326-338. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.tra.2006.09.010
Chen W, Chen KM. Study on connection of rail transit and bicycle traffic-a case study of Xi’an metro line2. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Civil Engineering for Architecture and Building Materials, Jinan, China; 2013.
Kager R, Bertolini L, Brömmelstroet TM. Characterisation of and reflections on the synergy of bicycles and public transportation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2016;85: 208-219. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.tra.2016.01.015
Chen Q, Chen J. Evaluation on the transfer efficiency between intercity rail and conventional public transit. Proceedings of the 16th COTA International Conference of Transportation, Shanghai, China; 2016.
Song Y, Wang ZC, Wang MS, Huang SG. Evaluation of rail transit transfer efficiency. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Railway Engineering: High-speed Railway, Heavy Haul Railway and Urban Rail Transit, Beijing, China; 2010.
Sun LS, Rong J, Ren F, Yao LY. Evaluation of passenger transfer efficiency of an urban public transportation terminal. Proceedings of the 10th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Bellevue, WA; 2007.
Sun XN, Mai YY, Wang XG. The structural equation model for public evaluation of the transfer efficiency of rail transit P&R facilities. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Green Building for Materials and Civil Engineering, Taiwan, China; 2013.
Cheng HB, Huang ZD, Hu XJ. A MCDM/MADM model for evaluating efficiency of rail-bus transfer. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Civil Engineering and Transportation, Guangzhou, China; 2016.
Xu L, Zhang XC, Chen JH, Yu J. Transfer efficiency evaluation method of rail transit based on the generalized cost function. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Civil Engineering and Transportation, Guizhou, China; 2014.
Guo Q, Wang YQ. Public bicycle and rail transit transfer efficiency evaluation-index system. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information. 2014;12(1): 11-16.
Xu Y, Yu S, Liu Y. Transfer efficiency evaluation between urban metro and buses with grey correlation method. Proceedings of the 5th Advanced Forum on Transportation of China, Beijing, China; 2009.
Zhu J, Zhao ZX, Qin Y, Wang ZY. Research on evaluation of transfer efficiency of rail transportation hub. Proceedings of the International Conference on System Science and Engineering, Dalian, China; 2012.
Xia XM, Ma XD. Evaluation-index system of urban rail and bus transfer integration. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2014;505-506: 809-812. Available from: doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.505-506.809
Wang ZC, Wang LJ, Gao F. Evaluation of transfer efficiency for urban rail transit. Railway Transport and Economy. 2008;30(1): 74-76.
Li PD. Evaluation study on station transfer coordination of rail transit and conventional transit in Harbin. PhD thesis. Chang’an University; 2015.
Aghdaie MH, Hashemkhani ZS, Zavadskas EK. Market segment evaluation and selection based on application of fuzzy AHP and COPRAS-G methods. Journal of Business Economics and Management. 2013;14(1): 213-233. Available from: doi:10.3846/16111699.2012.721392
Ertay T, Kahraman C, Kaya I. Evaluation of renewable energy alternatives using MACBETH and fuzzy AHP multicriteria methods: the case of Turkey. Technological and Economic Development of Economy. 2013;19(1): 38-62. Available from: doi:10.3846/20294913.2012.762950
Fouladgar MM, Yazdani-Chamzini A, Lashgari A, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z. Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and COPRAS under fuzzy environment. International Journal of Strategic Property Management. 2012;16(1): 85-104. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3846/1648715X.2012.666657
Chen T, Jin YY, Qiu XP, Chen X. A hybrid fuzzy evaluation method for safety assessment of food-waste feed based on entropy and the analytic hierarchy process methods. Expert Systems with Application. 2014;41(16): 7328-7337. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095741741400342X
Farhan J, Fwa TF. Pavement maintenance prioritization using analytic hierarchy process. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2009;2093: 12-24.
Stoilova S. An integrated approach for selection of intercity transport schemes on railway networks. Promet – Traffic&Transportation. 2018;30(4): 367-377. Available from: doi:10.7307/ptt.v30i4.2673
Saaty TL. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1980.
Su GH, Shi KB, Zhou F. Based on improvement AHP of construction project multi -objective optimal decision -making research. Water Conservancy Science and Technology and Economy. 2009;15(10): 867-870.
Sun HY, Wang SF, Hao X. An improved analytic hierarchy process method for the evaluation of agricultural water management in irrigation districts of north China. Agricultural Water Management. 2017;179: 324-337. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2016.08.002
Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal. 1948;27(3): 379-423.
Wu G, Duan K, Zuo J, Zhao XB, Tang DZ. Integrated sustainability assessment of public rental housing community based on a hybrid method of AHP-entropy weight and cloud model. Sustainability. 2017; 9(4): 1-25. Available from: doi: 10.3390/su9040603.
Huang WX, Cheng XW. Fuzzy evaluation of arable land suitability based on three scale AHP method. Proceedings of the International Conference on Geoinformatics, Wuhan, China, 2015.
Niu L, Chen K, Cheng Y. Application of improved AHP in employment comprehensive evaluation. Computer Simulation. 2011;28(5): 376-379.
Guest Editor: Eleonora Papadimitriou, PhD
Editors: Dario Babić, PhD; Marko Matulin, PhD; Marko Ševrović, PhD.
The mission of our journal is to provide high quality communication of research results, which is crucial for the effectiveness of scientific research, the promotion of scientific information, new ideas, and original research in the field of traffic and transportation engineering.
1848-4069
0353-5320
Proud publisher
Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science |
2024 © Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal
