Let's Connect
Follow Us
Watch Us
(+385) 1 2380 262
journal.prometfpz.unizg.hr
Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal

Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science

Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science

Sign In or Register Submit

PDF
PUBLISHED
01.03.2024
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v36i1.388
ISSUE
2024 (Vol 36), Issue 1
LICENSE
Copyright (c) 2024 Bojan Beškovnik
Creative Commons 4.0 logo
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-
NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Green Perspective of Air Cargo Transport Chains – The Case of Eastern Adriatic Region

Authors:Bojan Beškovnik

Abstract

This article deals with the highly topical issue of greening air transport chains. It is important to consider the environmental aspect of the current performance of air transport in regions with less intensive air transport chains, such as the Eastern Adriatic. The regional airports of Ljubljana, Zagreb and Belgrade are dependent on European air cargo hubs and at the same time have the task of connecting the national airports in Sarajevo, Podgorica, etc., which complicates the functioning of air transport chains regionally. A comprehensive consideration of air cargo chains is important in terms of price and transport time, but also in terms of the GHG footprint. The results show that an environmental assessment of air transport chains is necessary for a more comprehensive decision on sustainable supply chains. The study enriches the scientific understanding of air transport chains in the Eastern Adriatic region from the point of view of carbon footprint and energy efficiency of transport, and highlights the need to use the already developed IT tools in the assessment and modelling of transport chains when different options are presented to cargo owners. Integrating the above approaches and data into current business models enables the gradual regional decarbonisation of air transport.

Keywords:air transport, transport chains modelling, sustainable air transport assessment, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, Eastern Adriatic airports, road feeder service

References

  1. [1] IATA. The value of air cargo: Air cargo makes it happen. https://www.iata.org/en/programs/cargo/ [Accessed 12th May 2023].
  2. [2] Kupfer F, et al. The underlying drivers and future development of air cargo. Journal of Air Transport Management. 2017;61:6-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.07.002.
  3. [3] Janic M. Greening commercial air transportation by using Liquid hydrogen (LH2) as a fuel. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2014;39:16426-16441. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.08.011.
  4. [4] EASA. European aviation environmental report 2022. https://www.easa.europa.eu/eco/sites/default/files/2023-02/EnvironmentalReport_EASA_summary_12-online.pdf [Accessed 27th Aug. 2023].
  5. [5] Beifert A. Role of air cargo and road feeder services for regional airports—Case studies from the Baltic Sea region. Transport and Telecommunication Journal. 2016;17(2):87-99. DOI: 10.1515/ttj-2016-0008.
  6. [6] Beifert A, Prause G. Integrating air cargo road feeder services into green transport corridors. In: Kabashkin I, Yatskiv (Jackiva) I, Prentkovskis, O. (eds.) Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Springer, Cham. 2019. p. 409-420. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-12450-2_38.
  7. [7] Selinka G, Franz A, Stolletz R. Time-dependent performance approximation of truck handling operations at an air cargo terminal. Computers & Operations Research. 2016;65:164-173. DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2014.06.005.
  8. [8] Baxter GS. Assessing the carbon footprint of a dedicated all-cargo airline: The case of Cargolux international airlines. Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering. 2020;14(2):204-217. DOI: 10.4090/juee.2020.v14n2.204217.
  9. [9] IATA. Resolution on the industry’s commitment to reach net zero carbon emissions by 2050. https://www.iata.org/contentassets/dcd25da635cd4c3697b5d0d8ae32e159/iata-agm-resolution-on-net-zero-carbon-emissions.pdf [Accessed 10th Apr. 2023].
  10. [10] EASA. EASA’s Sustainable aviation programme. https://www.easa.europa.eu/eco/sustainable-aviation/topics/easas-sustainable-aviation-programme [Accessed 29th Aug. 2023].
  11. [11] Barke A, et al. Are sustainable aviation fuels a viable option for decarbonizing air transport in Europe? An Environmental and Economic Sustainability Assessment. Applied Sciences. 2022;12(2):597. DOI: 10.3390/app12020597.
  12. [12] Lößer L. A procedure model for low emission transportation chain planning. Promet – Traffic&Transportation. 2021;33(6): 893-904. DOI: 10.7307/ptt.v33i6.3935.
  13. [13] Beškovnik B, Golnar M. Evaluating the environmental impact of complex intermodal transport chains. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal. 2020;19(7):1131-1141. DOI: 10.30638/eemj.2020.107.
  14. [14] Anser MK, et al. The role of carbon pricing in the relationship between air freight and environmental resource depletion: A case study of Saudi Arabia. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 2023;25:1461-1472. DOI: 10.1007/s10098-020-01844-9.
  15. [15] Hileman IJ, Stratton WR, Donohoo EP. Energy content and alternative jet fuel viability. Journal of Propulson and Power. 2010;26(6):1184-1195. DOI: 10.2514/1.46232.
  16. [16] Yilmaz N, Atmanli A. Sustainable alternative fuels in aviation. Energy. 2017;140(2):1378-1386. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.077.
  17. [17] Janić M. An assessment of the potential of alternative fuels for “greening” commercial air transportation. Journal of Air Transport Management. 2018;69:235-247. DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.09.002.
  18. [18] Baxter G. Decarbonizing international air cargo transportation's carbon footprint: A review of the world air cargo carrying airlines current and potential environment related measures and strategies. International Journal of Environment Agriculture and Biotechnology. 2021;6(6):265-290. DOI: 10.22161/ijeab.66.31.
  19. [19] Habib Y, et al. Testing the heterogeneous effect of air transport intensity on CO2 emissions in G20 countries: An advanced empirical analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2022;29:44020–44041. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-18904-w.
  20. [20] Hu R, et al. Characteristics and mitigation measures of aircraft pollutant emissions at Nanjing Lukou International Airport (NKG), China. Promet – Traffic & Transportation. 2020;32(4): 461-474. DOI: 10.7307/ptt.v32i4.3280.
  21. [21] Bombelli A, et al. Analysis of the air cargo transport network using a complex network theory perspective. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2020;138:101959. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2020.101959.
  22. [22] Heinitz F, Hirschberger M, Werstat C. The role of road transport in scheduled air cargo networks. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013;104:1198-1207. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.216.
  23. [23] Berling P, Eng-Larsson F. Pricing and timing of consolidated deliveries in the presence of an express alternative: Financial and environmental analysis. European Journal of Operational Research. 2016:250(2):590-601. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.041.
  24. [24] Feng B, Li Y, Shen ZJM. Air cargo operations: Literature review and comparison with practices. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 2015;56:263-280, DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2015.03.028.
  25. [25] Choi JH, Park YH. Investigating paradigm shift from price to value in the air cargo market. Sustainability. 2020;12:10202. DOI: 10.3390/su122310202.
  26. [26] Demir WE, et al. Methodological approaches to reliable and green intermodal transportation. In: Cinar D, et al. (eds.) Sustainable Logistics and Transportation. Springer Optimization and Its Applications. 2017. p. 129. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-69215-9_7.
  27. [27] Zhou G, Zhang, Y. Integration and consolidation in air freight shipment planning: An economic and environmental perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017;166:1381-1394, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.145.
  28. [28] EASA. Environmental Labelling Scheme for Aviation. https://www.easa.europa.eu/eco/aviation-environmental-label/topics/the-case-for-an-environmental-label-in-aviation [Accessed 28th Aug. 2023].
  29. [29] EASA Aeroplane CO2 Emissions Database. https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/domains/environment/easa-aeroplane-co2-emissions-database-0 [Accessed 28th Aug. 2023].
  30. [30] ETW. Emission calculator. https://www.ecotransit.org/en/emissioncalculator/ [Accessed 18th Mar. 2023].
  31. [31] ICAO. ICAO Carbon Emissions Calculator (ICEC). https://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/Carbonoffset/Pages/default.aspx [Accessed 27th Aug. 2023].
  32. [32] IATA. IATA CO2 Connect Calculator. https://www.iata.org/en/services/statistics/intelligence/co2-connect/iata-co2-connect-passenger-calculator/ [Accessed 28th Aug. 2023].
  33. [33] Zagreb airport. Statistics. https://www.zagreb-airport.hr/en/business/b2b/statistics [Accessed 10th Apr. 2023].
  34. [34] Bloombergadria. Airfreight in the region. https://si.bloombergadria.com/ekonomija/slovenija/21539/letalski-promet-v-regiji-beograd-z-najvec-potniki-brniku-tovorni-skalp/news/ [Accessed 15th May 2023].
  35. [35] Stat.si. Air transport in 2021. https://www.stat.si/statweb/News/Index/10137 [Accessed 24th Apr. 2023].
Show more

SPECIAL ISSUE CALL

Innovation and New Technologies in Transport and Logistics

Guest Editor: Eleonora Papadimitriou, PhD

Editors: Dario Babić, PhD; Marko Matulin, PhD; Marko Ševrović, PhD.

RECENT PAPERS

Browse through the selection of our recent research
Bibliometric Analysis of Traffic Accident Prediction Studies from 2003 to 2023: Trends, Patterns and Future DirectionsEstimating Vehicle Turn-In Rate of Expressway Rest Areas via ETC Gantry Data – An ADPC-GMM ApproachResearch on the Efficiency of Major Airports in China’s Six Major Airport Cluster: Based on Common Frontier Super-Efficiency DEA and Malmquist MethodA Study on the Impact of Overtaking Lane-Changing Behaviour in Expressway Interchange Weaving Areas

Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science |
2024 © Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal