Let's Connect
Follow Us
Watch Us
(+385) 1 2380 262
journal.prometfpz.unizg.hr
Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal

Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science

Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science

PUBLISHED
06.02.2025
LICENSE
Copyright (c) 2025 Branislav ŠARKAN, Michal LOMAN, Ondrej STOPKA, Jacek CABAN, Arkadiusz MAŁEK

Quantifying the Volume of Particulate Matter at Bus Stations

Authors:Branislav ŠARKAN, Michal LOMAN, Ondrej STOPKA, Jacek CABAN, Arkadiusz MAŁEK

Abstract

Congested urban traffic substantially contributes to air pollution in cities. While waiting at bus stops, passengers may be exposed to increased contamination caused by vehicles, including particulate matter (PM). The modern bus stop layout, position and design ignore air quality and allow excessive exposure to pollution. Particulate matter seriously harms the environment, threatening human health and severely damaging all living organisms. The research purpose is to monitor particle emissions at the bus station in the city of Žilina (Slovakia), amassing data on exhaust emissions released from buses at the station premises. As moving or running-engine vehicles incessantly produce atmospheric emissions, we measure air quality during peak hours at the bus station. The results indicate a direct interconnection between passing vehicles and produced particle emissions, when multiple times higher emission levels are revealed. During the morning rush hour, the particulate matter exceeded 360% for PM2.5 and 420% for PM10. The research showed PM released directly from the buses tends to accumulate in covered premises of the bus station, severely damaging the health of passengers and staff. Our study warns about possible risks of deteriorating human health as waiting passengers unknowingly inhale contaminated particles. Our results indicate the largest emission producers and suggest remedial measures.

Keywords:air quality, emissions, particulate matter, vehicle, bus, station

References

  1. [1] Franco V, et al. Road vehicle emission factors development: A review. Atmospheric Environment. 2013;70:84-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.006.
  2. [2] Wu Y, at al. On-road vehicle emissions and their control in China: A review and outlook. Science of the Total Environment. 2017;574:332-349. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.040.
  3. [3] Waked A, Afif C. Emissions of air pollutants from road transport in Lebanon and other countries in the Middle East region. Atmospheric Environment. 2012;61:446-452. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.064.
  4. [4] Progiou A, Ziomas I. Twenty-year road traffic emissions trend in Greece. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 2012;223:305-317. DOI: 10.1007/s11270-011-0859-9.
  5. [5] Zhang K, et al. Vehicle emissions in congestion: Comparison of work zone, rush hour and free-flow conditions. Atmospheric Environment. 2011;45(11):1929-1939. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.030.
  6. [6] Elmi A, Al Rifai N. Pollutant emissions from passenger cars in traffic congestion situation in the state of Kuwait: Options and challenges. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 2012;14:619-624. DOI: 10.1007/s10098-011-0421-x.
  7. [7] Bleviss DL. Transportation is critical to reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment. 2021;10(2):e390. DOI: 10.1002/wene.390.
  8. [8] AlKheder S. Promoting public transport as a strategy to reduce GHG emissions from private vehicles in Kuwait. Environmental Challenges. 2021;3:100075. DOI: 10.1016/j.envc.2021.100075.
  9. [9] Harantová V, et al. Traffic accident occurrence, its prediction and causes. Proceedings of the Development of Transport by Telematics: 19th International Conference on Transport System Telematics, TST 2019, 27 Feb.-2 March 2019, Jaworze, Poland. 2019. p. 123-136. Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-27547-1_10.
  10. [10] Yu Q, Li T. Evaluation of bus emissions generated near bus stops. Atmospheric Environment. 2014;85:195-203. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.12.020.
  11. [11] Wang L, et al. Characteristics of airborne particles and the factors affecting them at bus stations. Atmospheric Environment. 2011;45(3):611-620. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.10.036.
  12. [12] Daniels R, Mulley C. Planning public transport networks—the neglected influence of topography. Journal of Public Transportation. 2012;15(4):23-41. DOI: 10.5038/2375-0901.15.4.2.
  13. [13] Gahlot V, et al. User oriented planning of bus rapid transit corridor in GIS environment. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment. 2012;1(1):102-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2012.07.004.
  14. [14] Koushki PA, Yaseen S, Ali LI. Evaluation of bus transit maintenance and operation costs in Kuwait. Transport Reviews. 1999;19(4):305-314. DOI: 10.1080/014416499295411.
  15. [15] Lopez-Carreiro I, Monzon A. Evaluating sustainability and innovation of mobility patterns in Spanish cities. Analysis by size and urban typology. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2018;38:684-696. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.029.
  16. [16] Nikolić M, Teodorović D. Transit network design by bee colony optimization. Expert Systems with Applications. 2013;40(15):5945-5955. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.05.002.
  17. [17] Kwan SC, et al. Trip characteristics as the determinants of intention to shift to rail transport among private motor vehicle users in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2018;36:319-326. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.030.
  18. [18] Özener O, Özkan M. Fuel consumption and emission evaluation of a rapid bus transport system at different operating conditions. Fuel. 2020;265:117016. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117016.
  19. [19] Horrox J, Casale M. Electric buses in America: Lessons from cities pioneering clean transportation. US PIRG Education Fund, Environment America Research and Policy Center, Frontier Group; 2019. https://pirg.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/US_Electric_bus_scrn-3.pdf [Accessed 6th June 2023].
  20. [20] Quirós-Tortós J, et al. Electric vehicles in Latin America: Slowly but surely toward a clean transport. IEEE Electrification Magazine. 2019;7(2):22-32. DOI: 10.1109/MELE.2019.2908791.
  21. [21] Wasiak A, et al. Hydrogen enriched hydrocarbons as new energy resources – As studied by means of computer simulations. Advances in Science and Technology Research. 2022;16(5):78-85. DOI: 10.12913/22998624/154001.
  22. [22] Khan RK, Strand MA. Road dust and its effect on human health: A literature review. Epidemiology and Health. 2018;40:e2018013. DOI: 10.4178/epih.e2018013.
  23. [23] Schibuola L, Tambani C. Indoor environmental quality classification of school environments by monitoring PM and CO2 concentration levels. Atmospheric Pollution Research. 2020;11:332-342. DOI: 10.1016/j.apr.2019.11.006.
  24. [24] Ly HB, et al. Development of an AI model to measure traffic air pollution from multisensor and weather data. Sensors. 2019;19:4941. DOI: 10.3390/s19224941.
  25. [25] Wang H, et al. Characteristics of air quality in different climatic zones of China during the COVID-19 lockdown. Environment International. 2021;12:101247. DOI: 10.1016/j.apr.2021.101247.
  26. [26] Hutchison KD, et al. The use of MODIS data and aerosol products for air quality prediction. Atmospheric Environment. 2004;38(30):5057-5070. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.06.032.
  27. [27] Xu S, et al. Strategies of method selection for fine-scale PM 2.5 mapping in an intra-urban area using crowdsourced monitoring. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 2019;12(5):2933-2948. DOI: 10.5194/amt-12-2933-2019.
  28. [28] Grivas G, et al. Spatial and temporal variation of PM10 mass concentrations within the greater area of Athens, Greece. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution. 2004;158(1):357-371. DOI: 10.1023/B:WATE.0000044859.84066.09.
  29. [29] Madrazo J, et al. Evidence of traffic-generated air pollution in Havana. Atmosphere. 2019;32(1):15-24. DOI: 10.20937/atm.2019.32.01.02.
  30. [30] Chang PK, et al. Particulate matter in a motorcycle-dominated urban area: Source apportionment and cancer risk of lung deposited surface area (LDSA) concentrations. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2022;427:128188. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.128188.
  31. [31] Kurz C, et al. Projection of the air quality in Vienna between 2005 and 2020 for NO2 and PM10. Urban Climate. 2014;10:703-719. DOI: 10.1016/j.uclim.2014.03.008.
  32. [32] Qu H, et al. Effects of traffic and urban parks on PM10 and PM2. 5 mass concentrations. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. 2019;45(2):1-13. DOI: 10.1080/15567036.2019.1672833.
  33. [33] Duque L, et al. Evaluating strategies to reduce urban air pollution. Atmospheric Environment. 2016;127:196-204. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.043.
  34. [34] Singh V, et al. Diurnal and temporal changes in air pollution during COVID-19 strict lockdown over different regions of India. Environmental Pollution. 2020;266:115368. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115368.
  35. [35] Khan Z, et al. A correlation among the COVID-19 spread, particulate matters, and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2: A review. Journal of Environmental and Public Health. 2021;May 2021. DOI: 10.1155/2021/5524098.
  36. [36] Roorda-Knape, et al. Air pollution from traffic in city districts near major motorways. Atmospheric Environment. 1998;32(11):1921-1930. DOI: 10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00496-2.
  37. [37] PCE. Professional. Calibrated. Equipment. Air Quality Particle Counting Meter PCE-PCO 2. 2024. https://www.pce-instruments.com/eu/api/getartfile?_fnr=1720693&_dsp=inline [Accessed 15th January 2024].
  38. [38] Santos G. Road transport and CO2 emissions: What are the challenges? Transport Policy. 2017; 59:71-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.06.007.
  39. [39] Uherek E, et al. Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: Land transport. Atmospheric Environment. 2010; 44(37):4772-4816. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.002.
  40. [40] Wu Y, et al. Evaluating vehicular exhaust and evaporative emissions via VOC measurement in an underground parking garage. Environmental Pollution. 2023; 333:122022. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122022.
  41. [41] Holland SP, et al. The environmental benefits of transportation electrification: Urban buses. Energy Policy. 2021; 148:111921. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111921.
  42. [42] Abbas M, et al. Air quality monitoring of particulate matter (PM2. 5 & PM 10) at Niazi and Daewoo bus station, Lahore. Fuuast Journal of Biology. 2017;7(1):13-18.
  43. [43] Aziz A, Bajwa IU. Energy and pollution control opportunities for Lahore. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment. 2004;75:751-760. DOI: 10.2495/UT040731.
  44. [44] Kim KH, et al. A review on the human health impact of airborne particulate matter. Environment International. 2015;74:136-143. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.005.
  45. [45] Rai PK. Multifaceted health impacts of particulate matter (PM) and its management: An overview. Environmental Skeptics and Critics. 2015;4(1):1-26.
  46. [46] Aminzadegan S, et al. Factors affecting the emission of pollutants in different types of transportation: A literature review. Energy Reports. 2022; 8:2508-2529. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.161.
  47. [47] Paisarnvirosrak N, et al. Algorithm with tabu search to solve the vehicle routing problem with minimized fuel emissions: Case study of canned fruits transport. LOGI – Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics. 2023; 14(1):263-274. DOI: 10.2478/logi-2023-0024.
  48. [48] Moore A, et al. Air quality at bus stops: Empirical analysis of exposure to particulate matter at bus stop shelters. Transportation Research Record. 2012;2270(1):76-86. DOI: 10.3141/2270-10.
  49. [49] Kendra M, et al. Environmental burden of different transport modes–Real case study in Slovakia. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2023;114:103552. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2022.103552.
Show more


Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science |
2024 © Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal