References
[1] Polydoropoulou A, Pagoni I, Tsirimpa A, Tsouros I. Modelling travelers’ behavior in the presence of reward schemes offered for green multimodal choices. Data Analytics: Paving the Way to Sustainable Urban Mobility. 2019; p. 353-361. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-02305-8_43.
[2] Raicu Ș, Costescu D. Mobilitate. Infrastructuri de trafic [Mobility. Traffic infrastructures]. Bucharest, Romania: AGIR Publishing; 2020.
[3] Krygsman S. Activity and travel choice(s) in multimodal public transport systems. Ph.D. thesis. Utrecht University, Faculty of Geographical Sciences; 2004.
[4] Clifton K, Muhs C. Capturing and representing multimodal trips in travel surveys. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2012;2285(1):74-83. DOI: 10.3141/2285-09.
[5] Reck D, Martin H, Axhausen K. Mode choice, substitution patterns and environmental impacts of shared and personal micro-mobility. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2022;102. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2021.103134.
[6] Krauss K, Krail M, Axhausen K. What drives the utility of shared transport services for urban travellers? A stated preference survey in German cities. Travel Behaviour and Society. 2022;26:206-220. DOI: 10.1016/j.tbs.2021.09.010.
[7] Crist P. The innovative mobility landscape. The case of mobility as a service. International Transport Forum. 2021; p. 9, 62. https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/innovative-mobility-landscape-maas.pdf [Accessed 3rd Feb. 2023].
[8] Ma Q, et al. Connecting metros with shared electric scooters: Comparisons with shared bikes and taxis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2022;109. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2022.103376.
[9] Sanders R, Branion-Calles M, Nelson T. To scoot or not to scoot: Findings from a recent survey about the benefits and barriers of using e-scooters for riders and non-riders. Transportation Research Part A. 2020;139:217-227. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2020.07.009.
[10] Tuncer S, Brown B. E-scooters on the ground: lessons for redesigning urban micro-mobility. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2020; p. 1-3. DOI: 10.1145/3313831.3376499.
[11] James O, et al. Pedestrians and e-scooters: An initial look at e-scooter parking and perceptions by riders and non-riders. Sustainability. 2019;11(20):1-2. DOI: 10.3390/su11205591.
[12] Mitra R, Hess P. Who are the potential users of shared e-scooters? An examination of socio-demographic, attitudinal and environmental factors. Travel Behaviour and Society. 2021;23:100-107. DOI: 10.1016/j.tbs.2020.12.004.
[13] Fearnley N, Berge SH, Johnsson E. Patterns of e-scooter use in combination with public transport, Transport Findings. 2020; p. 1-3. DOI: 10.32866/001c.13707.
[14] Kagerbauer M, Hilgert T, Schroeder O, Vortisch P. Household travel survey of intermodal trips – Approach, challenges and comparison. Transportation Research Procedia. 2015;11:330-339. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2015.12.028.
[15] Bakogiannis E, Vlastos T, Athanasopoulos K, Vassi A. Exploring motivators and deterrents of cycling tourism using qualitative social research methods and participative analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Sustainability. 2020;12(6). DOI: 10.3390/su12062418.
[16] Hamadneh J, Jaber A. Modeling of intra-city transport choice behaviour in Budapest, Hungary. Journal of Urban Mobility. 2023;3. DOI: 10.1016/j.urbmob.2023.100049.
[17] Jie F, et al. Factors affecting the adoption of shared mobility systems: Evidence from Australia. Research in Transportation Business & Management. 2021;41. DOI: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100651.
[18] Esztergar-Kiss D, Tordai D, Lopez Lizarraga J. Assessment of travel behavior related to e-scooters using a stated preference experiment. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2022;166:389-405. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2022.11.010.
[19] Shokouhyar S, Shokoohyar S, Sobhani A, Gorizi AJ. Shared mobility in post-COVID era: New challenges and opportunities. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2021;67. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102714.
[20] Wikipedia. Iași. https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ia%C8%99i [Accessed 25th Feb. 2023].
[21] Romanian National Institute of Statistics. http://statistici.insse.ro:8077/tempo-online/#/pages/tables/insse-table [Accessed 11th Oct. 2022].
[22] Dragu V, Roman EA. Accesibility of urban public transport network component of sustainable development. Quality Research Center. 2011. p. 109-117. https://msdjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/vol3issue1-21.pdf [Accessed 5th Mar. 2023].
[23] Roșu L. Metode de analiză a accesibilității populației la mijloacele de transport în comun. studiu de caz: Municipiul Iaşi [Methods of analyzing the population's accessibility to public transport. Case study: Iasi Municipality]. Geographia Napocensis. 2013;7:1-4.
[24] Ghionea F. Transport urban. Fenomenul [Urban transport. The phenomenon]. Bucharest, Romania: MATRIX ROM print; 2005.