Abstract

Analizirani su kriteriji infrastrukture javnog prijevoza, koji značajno utječu na zadovoljstvo korisnika. Primarna pažnja bila je usmjerena na ocjenjivanje tih kriterija od najviše do najmanje važnih. Analiza znanstvenih radova, stručne literature, propisa Europske unije, litavskog zakonodavstva i preporuka korištena je za istraživanje potrebnih kriterija koji imaju značajan utjecaj na popularnost javnog prijevoza, njegovu funkcionalnost i daje referencu kako poboljšati učinkovitost gradsko stanovništvo bira javni prijevoz. Stručna i društvena istraživanja korištena su za utvrđivanje kriterija procjene infrastrukture javnog prijevoza te za istraživanje stanja tih kriterija. Ti su kriteriji ocijenjeni i rangirani prema prioritetima putem višekriterijske analize. Rezultati odražavaju prioritete kriterija parametara infrastrukture javnog prijevoza. Ovi parametri imaju najznačajniji utjecaj na poboljšanje razine usluge infrastrukture javnog prijevoza u urbanim područjima.

References

Uspalyte-Vitkuniene R, Vitkunas S. Public Transport Systems in Baltic States. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of Environmental Engineering, 22-23 May 2008, Vilnius, Lithuania, Vol. 3; 2008. p. 1081-1086.

Chowdhury S, Hadas Y, Gonzalez VA, Schot B. Public transport users' and policy makers' perceptions of integrated public transport systems. Transport Policy. 2018;61: 75-83. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.10.001

Francis R, Elliott D. Infrastructure funding: does it matter where the money comes from? 2019. 25 p. Available from: https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/infrastructure-funding-where-money-comes-from.pdf [Accessed 15th Sep. 2019].

Karou S, Hull A. Accessibility modelling: predicting the impact of planned transport infrastructure on accessibility patterns in Edinburgh, UK. Journal of Transport Geography. 2014;35: 1-11.

Susnienė D, Jurkauskas A. Stakeholder Approach in the Management of Public Transport Companies. Transport. 2008;23(3): 214-220. Available from: doi:10.3846/1648-4142.2008.23.214-220

Ceder AA, Butcher M, Wang L. Optimization of bus stop placement for routes on uneven topography. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 2015;74: 40-61. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.trb.2015.01.006

Li H, Bertini RL. Optimal bus stop spacing for minimizing transit operation cost. Traffic and Transportation Studies. 2008;51: 553-564. Available from: doi:10.1061/40995(322)51

Li H. Assessment of an optimal bus stop spacing model using high resolution archived stop-level dana. MSc thesis. Portland State University; 2011.

Daniels R, Mulley C. Explaining walking distance to public transport: The dominance of public transport supply. Journal of Transport and Land Use. 2013;6(2): 5-20. Available from: doi:10.5198/jtlu.v6i2.308

Verseckienė A, Meškauskas V, Batarlienė N. Urban Public Transport Accessibility for People with Movement Disorders: The Case Study of Vilnius. Procedia Engineering. 2016;134: 48-56. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.038

Tyler N, Caiaffa M. Design of Fully Accessible Bus Stops. Infrastructure Elements for Buses and Drivers. In: Proceedings of AET European Transport Conference, 1 January 1999 Cambridge; 1999. p. 433-439. Available from: http://etcproceedings.org/paper/design-of-fully-accessible-bus-stops-infrastructure-elements-for-buses-and-dri [Accessed 28th Jan. 2017].

Boyle DK. Better On-Street Bus Stops. Transportation research, Report number: Project J-7 SA-35, 2015. Available from: http://www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/172376.aspx [Accessed 22th Sept. 2017].

Newton A. Crime on public transport. Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice. 2014: 709-720. Available from: doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_301

Agrawal AW, Goldman T, Hannaford N. Shared-use bus priority lanes on city streets: Case studies in design and management. Mineta Transportation Institute, No. CA-MTI-12-2606, 2012. Available from: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://scholar.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1026&context=mti_publications

Siedler CE. Can bus rapid transit be a sustainable means of public transport in fast growing cities? Empirical evidence in the case of Oslo. Transportation Research Procedia. 2014;1(1): 109-120. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2014.07.012

Canales C, Estrada Romeu MÁ, Thorson Bofarull L, Robusté Antón F. Public transport policies in Europe: implementing bus rapid transit systems in major European cities. In: Proceedings of European Transport Conference 2006. Association for European Transport; 2006; p. 1-15. Available from: https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstream/handle/2117/15615/2443737.pdf [Accessed 15th Apr. 2018].

Viegas J, Lu B. The intermittent bus lane signals setting within an area. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 2004;12(6): 453-469. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.trc.2004.07.005

Ušpalytė-Vitkūnienė R. Modelling and development of town public transport network (on example of Vilnius city). PhD thesis. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University; 2006.

Cats O, Jenelius E. Dynamic vulnerability analysis of public transport networks: mitigation effects of real-time information. Networks and Spatial Economics. 2014;14(3-4): 435-463. Available from: doi:10.1007/s11067-014-9237-7

Petrović J, Ivković I, Vujačić I, Žeželj S. Possibilities of buses on alternative fuel in public urban transport in Belgrade. Technological and Economic Development of Economy. 2009;15(1): 78-89. Available from: doi:10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.78-89

Arditi D, Gunaydin HM. Perceptions of process quality in building projects. Journal of Management in Engineering. 1999;15(2): 43-53. Available from: doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1999)15:2(43)

Yoon K, Hwang СL. TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution)–a multiple attribute decision making, w: Multiple attribute decision making–methods and applications, a state-of-the-art survey. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1981; p. 128-140.