Pedestrian crossing speed is the key element in the design of pedestrian facilities. It depends on various attributes related to road, traffic and pedestrians. In this paper, an attempt has been made to explore the variation, examine the influencing factors and formulate a model for the pedestrian crossing speed at signalised intersection crosswalks. The data have been collected using video graphic technique at 16 signalised crosswalks of the Chandigarh city. The findings reveal that a 15th percentile crossing speed (1.11-1.31 m/s) exceeds the design crossing speed of 0.95 m/s. It is also higher than the crossing speed of 1.2 m/s, usually being prescribed and adopted in the developed countries. The statistical analysis indicates no significant difference in the percentile crossing speeds between males and females. However, the variation exists among different age groups, group sizes, and crossing patterns. The correlation analysis depicts that the pedestrian crossing speed has significant negative correlation with the crosswalk width, the crosswalk length, the width of the pedestrian island, the classification of road, average traffic flow and average pedestrian delay, whereas the availability of separate bicycle paths at intersections is positively correlated. Furthermore, the stepwise regression model with 70.1 percent accuracy reveals that the crosswalk width, the width of the pedestrian island and the average pedestrian delay play a predominant role in determining the pedestrian crossing speed. The authors propose the usage of the developed model for setting out the standards for the appropriate design crossing speed for different crosswalks having similar geometric and traffic conditions as that of the study area.
Tiwari G, Bangdiwala S, Saraswat A, Gaurav, S. Survival Analysis: Pedestrian Risk Exposure at Signalized Intersections. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2007;10: 77-89. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.trf.2006.06.002
Mohan D, Tiwari G, Bhalla K. Road Safety in India. Transportation Research and Injury Prevention Programme (TRIPP), New Delhi, India; 2015. Available from: https://www.worldcat.org/title/road-safety-in-india-status-report/oclc/934705592
Dewar RE. Driver and pedestrian characteristics. In: J. Pline, ed. Traffic engineering handbook. 4th Ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1992.
Transportation Research Board. Highway capacity manual. National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Special Rep. No. 209, 2000. Available from: http://www.trb.org/Publications/Blurbs/153893.aspx
FHWA. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Washington, D.C.: Federal Highway Administration; 1988. Available from: https://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/
IRC (Indian Road Congress): 103. Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities. New Delhi, India; 1988.
Holland C, Hill R. The effect of age, gender and driver status on pedestrians’ intentions to cross the road in risky situations. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2007;39(2): 224-237. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.aap.2006.07.003
Guerrier JH, Jolibois JSC. The safety of elderly pedestrians at five urban intersections in Miami. Proc., HFES 42nd Annual Meeting, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA; 1998. p. 35-42.
Peters D, Kim L, Zaman R, Haas G, Cheng J, Ahmed S. Pedestrian Crossing Behavior at Signalized Intersections in New York City. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board. 2015;2519: 179-188. Available from: doi:10.3141/2519-20
Xie SQ, Wong SC, Nga TM, Lam HK. Pedestrian Crossing Behavior at Signalized Crosswalks. Journal of Transportation Engineering Part A: Systems. 2017;143(8): 17-26. Available from: doi:10.1061/JTEPBS.0000055
Lam WHK, Cheung, CY. Pedestrian speed/flow relationships for walking facilities in Hong Kong. Journal of Transportation Engineering Part A: Systems. 2000;126: 343-349. Available from: doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2000)126:4(343)
Goh BH, Subramaniam K, Wai YT, Ali A. Pedestrian Crossing Speed: The Case of Malaysia. International Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. 2012;2: 323-332. Available from: doi:10.7708/ij_e.2012.2(4).03
Griffiths JD, Hunt JG, Marlow M. Delays at Pedestrian Crossings: Site Observation and the Interpretation of Data. Traffic Engineering & Control. 1984;25: 365-371. Available from: http://worldcat.org/issn/00410683
Sjostedt L. Behaviour of pedestrians at pedestrian crossings. Stockholm, Sweden: National Swedish Road Research Institute; 1967.
Cresswell C, Griffiths JD, Hunt JG. Site evaluation of a pelican crossing simulation model. Traffic Engineering & Control. 1978;19: 546-549.
Wilson DG, Grayson GB. Age–Related Differences in the Road Crossing Behavior of Adult Pedestrians. Transport Research Laboratory, TRB, NCHRP, Washington, D.C. Report No. LR 933, 1980. Available from: https://trid.trb.org/view/168876
Knoblauch RL, Pietrucha MT, Nitzburg M. Field Studies of Pedestrian Walking Speed and Start-Up Time. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board. 1996;1538: 27-38. Available from: doi:10.3141/1538-04
Fitzpatrick K, Brewer MA, Turner S. Another look at pedestrian walking speed. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board. 2006;1981: 21-29. Available from: doi:10.3141/1982-05
Gates TJ, Noyce DA, Bill AR, Van ER. Recommended walking speeds for pedestrian clearance timing based on pedestrian characteristics. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board. 2006;1982: 38-47. Available from: doi:10.1177/0361198106198200106
Bowman BL, Vecellio RL. Pedestrian Walking Speeds and Conflicts at Urban Median Locations. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board. 1994;1438: 67-76. Available from: http://worldcat.org/isbn/0309055199
Daamen W, Hoogendorn, SP. Pedestrian free speed behaviour in crossing flows. Traffic and Granular Flow. 2007;05: 299-304. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-47641-2_25
Asaithambi G, Kuttan MO, Chandra S. Pedestrian Road Crossing Behavior Under Mixed Traffic Conditions: A Comparative Study of an Intersection Before and After Implementing Control Measures. Transportation in Developing Economies. 2016;2. Available from: doi:10.1007/s40890-016-0018-5
Marisamynathan S, Vedagiri P. Modeling Pedestrian Delay at Signalized Intersection Crosswalks under Mixed Traffic Condition. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2016;104(1): 708-717. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.165
Chandra S, Rastogi R, Das VR, Ilango T. Pedestrian behaviour under varied traffic and spatial conditions. European Transport. 2014;56(1): 52-64.
Tanaboriboon Y, Guyano JA. Analysis of Pedestrian Movement in Bangkok. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board. 1991;1294: 52-56.
Tarawneh MS. Evaluation of pedestrian speed in Jordan with investigation of some contributing factors. Journal of Safety Research. 2001;32: 229–236. Available from: doi:10.1016/S0022-4375(01)00046-9
Subramanyam B, Prasanna Kumar R. Improving pedestrian facilities in congested urban areas: a case study of Chennai city. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2017; paper no. 80. Available from: doi:10.1088/1755-1315/80/1/012059
DiPietro CM, King LE. Pedestrian gap-acceptance. Highway Research Record: Highway Research Board. 1970;308: 80-91.
Hatfield J, Murphy S. The effects of mobile phone use on pedestrian crossing behaviour at signalized and unsignalized intersections. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2007;39: 197-205. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.aap.2006.07.001
Goh PK, Lam WHK. Pedestrian Flows and Walking Speed: A Problem at Signalized Crosswalks. Institute of Transportation Engineers Journal. 2004;74(1): 28-33. Available from: http://worldcat.org/oclc/614107147
Rastogi R, Chandra S, Vamsheedhar J, Das VR. Parametric Study of Pedestrian Speeds at Midblock Crossings. Journal of Urban Planning & Development. 2011;137: 381-389. Available from: doi:10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000083
Mantecchini L, Paganelli F. Empirical Analysis of Pedestrian Delay Models at Urban Intersections. Contemporary Engineering Services. 2015;8(21): 981-990. Available from: doi:10.12988/ces.2015.57202
Muleya D, Kharbechea M, Alhajyaseena W, Al-Salem M. Pedestrians’ Crossing Behavior at Marked Crosswalks on Channelized Right-Turn Lanes at Intersections. Procedia Computer Science. 2017;109: 233-240. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.339
Boroujerdian A, Nemati S. Pedestrian Gap Acceptance Logit Model in Unsignalized Crosswalks Conflict Zone. International Journal of Transportation Engineering. 2016:4(2).
Robertson HD, Hummer J, Nelson D. Manual of Traffic Engineering Studies. Washington, D.C.: Institute of Transportation Engineers; 1994.
Transportation Research Board. Highway capacity manual. National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Special Rep. No. 209, 1994. Available from: http://www.trb.org/Publications/Blurbs/153893.aspx
Li Q, Wang Z, Yang J, Wang J. Pedestrian Delay Estimation at Signalized Intersection in Developing Cities. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2005:39(1): 61-73. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.tra.2004.11.002
Behbahani H, Gilani VNM, Samet MJ, Salehfard R. Analysis of Crossing Speed of the Pedestrians in Marked and Unmarked Crosswalks in the Signalized and Un-Signalized Intersections (Case Study: Rasht city). IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2017; paper no. 245.
The Tribune. Pedestrian Deaths Ring Alarm Bells; 2017. Available from: https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/chandigarh/community/pedestrian-deaths-ringalarm-bells/346580.html
FHWA. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways. Washington, D.C.: Federal Highway Administration; 2003. Available from: https://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/