Let's Connect
Follow Us
Watch Us
(+385) 1 2380 262
journal.prometfpz.unizg.hr
Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal

Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science

Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science

Sign In or Register Submit

PDF
PUBLISHED
20.06.2024
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v36i3.607
ISSUE
2024 (Vol 36), Issue 3
LICENSE
Copyright (c) 2024 Shakir Mahmud, Dario Babić, Timothy J. Gates
Creative Commons 4.0 logo
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-
NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

A Comprehensive Review of Dynamic Speed Feedback Signs in Reducing Speed at Different Critical Locations

Authors:Shakir Mahmud, Dario Babić, Timothy J. Gates

Abstract

Excessive speed is one of the main causes of fatal crashes worldwide. One speed reduction measure is dynamic speed feedback signs (DSFS), whose main purpose is to make drivers aware of their excessive speed and thus influence their behaviour in a way that they reduce their driving speed. The objective of this review is to discuss the benefits of implementing DSFS in different settings, identify the most effective placement and messaging strategies, analyse the public perception and temporal effect of DSFS, and identify potential locations where this device can be further deployed. The study includes 44 studies, of which 35 are journal publications, three are conference proceedings and six are technical reports. The identified studies are divided into six categories based on their topic: (1) operational benefits of DSFS; (2) safety benefits of DSFS; (3) public perception of DSFS; (4) position of DSFS installation, message type and triggering; (5) temporal effect of DSFS; and 6) effect of vehicle type. The results of this study provide information on the use of DSFS and as such are valuable to road authorities and researchers.

Keywords:dynamic speed feedback sign, driving speed, driver behaviour, road safety, review

References

  1. [1] Flynn DFB, et al. Dynamic speed feedback signs are effective in reducing driver speeds: A meta-analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2020;2674(12):481–492. DOI: 10.1177/0361198120957326.
  2. [2] Nnaji C, Gambatese J, Lee HW, Zhang F. Improving construction work zone safety using technology: A systematic review of applicable technologies. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition). 2020;7(1):61–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtte.2019.11.001.
  3. [3] Garber NJ, Patel ST. Effectiveness of changeable message signs in controlling vehicle speeds in work zones. Virginia Transportation Research Council. Report Number: FHWA/VA-95-R4, 1994.
  4. [4] Garber NJ, Srinivasan S. Influence of exposure duration on the effectiveness of changeable-message signs in controlling vehicle speeds at work zones. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 1998;1650(1):62–70. DOI: 10.3141/1650-08.
  5. [5] McCoy PT, Bonneson JA, Kollbaum JA. Speed reduction effects of speed monitoring displays with radar in work zones on interstate highways. South Dakota, USA: Transportation Research Record; 1995. https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1995/1509/1509-009.pdf. [Accessed 15th January 2023].
  6. [6] Pesti G, McCoy PT. Long-term effectiveness of speed monitoring displays in work zones on rural interstate highways. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2001;1754(1):21–30. DOI: 10.3141/1754-03.
  7. [7] Fontaine MD, Carlson PJ. Evaluation of speed displays and rumble strips at rural-maintenance work zones. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2001;1745(1):27–38. DOI: 10.3141/1745-04.
  8. [8] Thompson B. Evaluation of radar activated changeable message sign for work zone speed control. Maine Department of Transportation, Transportation Research Division. Report number: 42751, 2002.
  9. [9] Wang C, Dixon KK, Jared D. Evaluating speed-reduction strategies for highway work zones. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2003;1824(1):44–53. DOI: 10.3141/1824-06.
  10. [10] Sorrell MT, et al. Use of radar-equipped portable changeable message sign to reduce vehicle speed in South Carolina work zones. Transportation Research Board 86th Annual Meeting. Report number: 07-3159, 2007.
  11. [11] Brewer MA, Pesti G, Schneider W. Improving compliance with work zone speed limits. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2006;1948(1):67–76. DOI: 10.1177/0361198106194800108.
  12. [12] Roberts CA, Smaglik EJ. Driver feedback on monetary penalty and its impact on work zone speed. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2012;2272(1):27–34. DOI: 10.3141/2272-04.
  13. [13] Zhang F, Gambatese JA. Highway construction work-zone safety: Effectiveness of traffic-control devices. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction. 2017;22(4):04017010. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000327.
  14. [14] Banerjee S, Jeihani M, Khadem N. K. Influence of work zone signage on driver speeding behavior. Journal of Modern Transportation. 2019;27(1),52–60. DOI: 10.1007/s40534-019-0182-5.
  15. [15] Anderson SM, Cunningham JR, Liang J, Fitzsimmons E. Evaluation of the effectiveness of dynamic speed feed back signs in work zones on high-speed Kansas roadways. Transportation Research Board 100th Annual Meeting, 05–29 January 2021. Virtual event. 2021.
  16. [16] Tribbett L, McGowen P, Mounce J. An evaluation of dynamic curve warning systems in the Sacramento River Canyon. Western Transportation Institute Montana State University; 2000.
  17. [17] Ullman GL, Rose ER. Evaluation of dynamic speed display signs. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2005;1918(1):92–97. DOI: 10.1177/0361198105191800112.
  18. [18] Monsere CM, et al. Measuring the impacts of speed reduction technologies. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2005;1918(1):98–107. DOI: 10.1177/0361198105191800113.
  19. [19] Hallmark SL, Qiu Y, Hawkins N, Smadi O. Crash modification factors for dynamic speed feedback signs on rural curves. Journal of Transportation Technologies. 2015;05(01):9–23. DOI: 10.4236/jtts.2015.51002.
  20. [20] Mahmud MS, et al. Evaluating driver response to a dynamic speed feedback sign at rural highway curves. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2022;2677(2):1103–1114. DOI: 10.1177/03611981221112401.
  21. [21] Montella A, Galante F, Mauriello F, Pariota L. Effects of traffic control devices on rural curve driving behavior. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2015;2492(1):10–22. DOI: 10.3141/2492-02.
  22. [22] Sandburg W, Schoenecker T, Sebastian K, Soler D. Long-term effectiveness of Dynamic Speed Monitoring Displays (DSMD) for speed management at speed limit transitions. 2006.
  23. [23] Cruzado I, Donnell ET. Evaluating effectiveness of dynamic speed display signs in transition zones of two-lane, rural highways in Pennsylvania. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2009;2122(1):1–8. DOI: 10.3141/2122-01.
  24. [24] Hallmark SL, Hawkins N, Knickerbocker S. Use of DSFS as a speed transition zone countermeasure in small, rural communities. IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2015; p. 1448–1454. 10.1109/ITSC.2015.237.
  25. [25] Mahmud MS, et al. Driver response to a dynamic speed feedback sign at speed transition zones along high-speed rural highways. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2022;2677(2):1341–1353. DOI: 10.1177/03611981221112942.
  26. [26] Mahmud MS, et al. Driver response to a dynamic speed feedback sign on freeway exit ramps based on sign location, interchange type, and time of day. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2021;2675(10):1236–1247. DOI: 10.1177/03611981211015250.
  27. [27] Walter L, Broughton J. Effectiveness of speed indicator devices: An observational study in South London. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2011;43(4):1355–1358. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.02.008.
  28. [28] Karimpour A, Kluger R, Wu YJ. Traffic sensor data-based assessment of speed feedback signs. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security. 2021;13(12):1302–1325. DOI: 10.1080/19439962.2020.1731038.
  29. [29] Karimpour A, Kluger R, Liu C, Wu YJ. Effects of speed feedback signs and law enforcement on driver speed. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2021;77:55–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2020.11.011.
  30. [30] O’Brien SW, Simpson CL. Use of “your speed” changeable message signs in school zones. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2012;2318(1):128–136. DOI: 10.3141/2318-15.
  31. [31] Williamson MR, Fries R, Zhou H. Long-term effectiveness of radar speed display signs in a university environment. Journal of Transportation Technologies. 2016;06(03):99–105. DOI: 10.4236/jtts.2016.63009.
  32. [32] Bloch SA. Comparative study of speed reduction effects of photo-radar and speed display boards. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 1998;1640(1):27–36. DOI: 10.3141/1640-05.
  33. [33] City of Bellevue Transportation Department. Stationary Radar Sign Program. 2009.
  34. [34] Gehlert T, Schulze C, Schlag B. Evaluation of different types of dynamic speed display signs. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2012;15(6):667–675. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2012.07.004.
  35. [35] Churchill AE, Mishra S. Speed feedback signs as a tool to manage demand for lower residential speeds. 2016 Conference and Exhibition of the Transportation Association of Canada, 25–28 September 2016, Toronto, Canada. 2016. p. 1–14. https://trid.trb.org/View/1434853 [Accessed 15th January 2023].
  36. [36] Chang KN, Nolan M, Nihan NL. Measuring neighborhood traffic safety benefits by using real-time driver feedback technology. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2005;1922(1):44–51. DOI: 10.1177/0361198105192200107.
  37. [37] Wu M, El-Basyouny K, Kwon TJ. Before-and-after empirical Bayes evaluation of citywide installation of driver feedback signs. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2020;2674(4):419–427. DOI: 10.1177/0361198120912243.
  38. [38] Wu M, El-Basyouny K, Kwon TJ. Lessons learned from the large-scale application of Driver Feedback Signs in an urban city. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security. 2021;13(12):1283–1301. DOI: 10.1080/19439962.2020.1726546.
  39. [39] Jeihani M, Ardeshiri A, Naeeni A. Evaluating the effectiveness of dynamic speed display signs. Department of Transportation and Urban Infrastructure Studies; 2012.
  40. [40] Santiago-Chaparro KR, Chitturi M, Bill A, Noyce DA. Spatial effectiveness of speed feedback signs. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2012;2281(1):8–15. DOI: 10.3141/2281-02.
  41. [41] Zhao X, Huang L, Guan W, Rong J. Evaluation of effects of warning sign position on driving behavior in horizontal sharp curves. Advances in Mechanical Engineering. 2015;7(2):971290. DOI: 10.1155/2014/971290.
  42. [42] Gates TJ, et al. Evaluation of alternative messages and sign locations on driver response to a dynamic speed feedback sign on a freeway interchange ramp. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2020;2674(12):530–541. DOI: 10.1177/0361198120959076.
  43. [43] Jomaa D, Dougherty M, Yella S, Edvardsson K. Effectiveness of trigger speed of vehicle-activated signs on mean and standard deviation of speed. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security. 2016;8(4):293–309. DOI: 10.1080/19439962.2014.976690.
  44. [44] Jomaa D, Yella S. Predicting automatic trigger speed for vehicle-activated signs. Journal of Intelligent Systems. 2018;29(1):1079–1091. DOI: 10.1515/jisys-2016-0329.
  45. [45] Ardeshiri A, Jeihani M. A speed limit compliance model for dynamic speed display sign. Journal of Safety Research. 2014;51:33–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2014.08.001.
  46. [46] Jue MJ, Jarzab JT. Long-term effectiveness of radar speed feedback signs for speed management. Institute of Transportation Engineers. ITE Journal. 2020;90(5):40–44. DOI: https://trid.trb.org/view/1732440.
  47. [47] Glendon AI, Prendergast S. Rank-ordering anti-speeding messages. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2019;132:105254. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.07.030.
Show more

SPECIAL ISSUE CALL

Innovation and New Technologies in Transport and Logistics

Guest Editor: Eleonora Papadimitriou, PhD

Editors: Dario Babić, PhD; Marko Matulin, PhD; Marko Ševrović, PhD.

RECENT PAPERS

Browse through the selection of our recent research
A Review of Expert Systems Integration in Signal Plan OptimisationBibliometric Analysis of Traffic Accident Prediction Studies from 2003 to 2023: Trends, Patterns and Future DirectionsResearch on the Efficiency of Major Airports in China’s Six Major Airport Cluster: Based on Common Frontier Super-Efficiency DEA and Malmquist MethodFactors Influencing Sustained Use of Shared E-Scooter Services in Urban Taiwan

Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science |
2024 © Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal