Let's Connect
Follow Us
Watch Us
(+385) 1 2380 262
journal.prometfpz.unizg.hr
Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal

Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science

Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science

Sign In or Register Submit

PDF
PUBLISHED
27.08.2024
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v36i4.556
ISSUE
2024 (Vol 36), Issue 4
LICENSE
Copyright (c) 2024 Andrei AGACHE, Timea CISMA, Marian MOCAN, Larisa IVASCU
Creative Commons 4.0 logo
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-
NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Driving Towards Sustainable Transportation Systems: A bottom-up Traffic Modal Choices Analysis Using Responsible Management for Future Development Planning

Authors:Andrei AGACHE, Timea CISMA, Marian MOCAN, Larisa IVASCU

Abstract

The transportation sector wields substantial influence on society, encompassing economic, social and environmental dimensions of sustainability. Recognising environmentally conscious actions initiated by individuals, particularly at grassroots levels, fosters the development of a pro-environmental social identity. The article aims to analyse the transportation systems from a bottom-up perspective within a municipality. Consequently, three objectives are proposed for this research paper: investigate citizen behaviour regarding transportation, assess the strengths and weaknesses of communities based on citizen perspectives and generate ideas for improving transit through responsible management principles using a bottom-up approach. It has been determined that private car is the most commonly used mode of transportation. The number of cars is the only variable that influences the choice of transportation. A significant positive relationship has been identified between the number of cars and car travels, while a negative relationship has been observed between the number of cars and travels by transit, pedestrian or bicycle. In addition to this, other significant relationships were determined. Regarding the second objective, the majority of the interviewees perceive that the commune lacks any significant strengths. In terms of enhancement opportunities, respondents express a desire for improvements in pedestrian and cyclist infrastructure, transit facilities and the addition of more lanes and roads.

Keywords:green mobility, traffic, sustainable transportation, sustainable development, responsible management

References

  1. [1] Gifford R, Kormos C, McIntyre A. Behavioral dimensions of climate change: drivers, responses, barriers, and interventions. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change. 2011;2:801–27. DOI: 10.1002/wcc.143.
  2. [2] Steg L, Bolderdijk JW, Keizer K, Perlaviciute G. An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2014;38:104-15. DOI: 10.1016/J.JENVP.2014.01.002.
  3. [3] Ivascu L, et al. New insights into corporate sustainability, environmental management and corporate financial performance in European Union: An application of VAR and Granger causality approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2022;29. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-21642-8.
  4. [4] Fritsche I, et al. A social identity model of pro-environmental action (SIMPEA). Psychological Review. 2018;125(2):245-269. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000090.
  5. [5] Jans L. Changing environmental behaviour from the bottom up: The formation of pro-environmental social identities. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2021;73:101531. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101531.
  6. [6] Sangaradasse P, Eswari S. Importance of traffic and transportation plan in the context of land use planning for cities – A review. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research. 2019;14(9):2275-2281. DOI:10.37628/jtpm.v6i2.646.
  7. [7] Afrin T, Yodo N. A survey of road traffic congestion measures towards a sustainable and resilient transportation system. Sustainability. 2020;12. DOI: 10.3390/su12114660.
  8. [8] Ribeiro P, Fonseca F, Santos P. Sustainability assessment of a bus system in a mid-sized municipality. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 2019;63. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2019.1577224.
  9. [9] Yigitcanlar T, Rashid K, Dur F. Sustainable urban and transport development for transportation disadvantaged: A review. The Open Transportation Journal. 2010;4. DOI: 10.2174/1874447801004010001.
  10. [10] Shah KJ, et al. Green transportation for sustainability: Review of current barriers, strategies, and innovative technologies. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021;326:129392. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129392.
  11. [11] Laasch O, Conaway RN. Principles of responsible management: Glocal sustainability, responsibility, ethics. Stamford: Cengage. 2015.
  12. [12] Van Fan Y, et al. Cross-disciplinary approaches towards smart, resilient and sustainable circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;232:1482–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.266.
  13. [13] Ngan SL, et al. Prioritization of sustainability indicators for promoting the circular economy: The case of developing countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2019;111:314–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.001.
  14. [14] Beatley T, Wheeler SM. The sustainable urban development reader. Routledge London, UK; 2004.
  15. [15] Banister D. Sustainable urban development and transport: A Eurovision for 2020. Transp Reviews. 2000;20:113–30. DOI: 10.1080/014416400295365.
  16. [16] United Nations. ADOPTION OF THE PARIS AGREEMENT - Paris Agreement 2015.
  17. [17] Miller P, de Barros AG, Kattan L, Wirasinghe SC. Public transportation and sustainability: A review. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 2016;20:1076–83. DOI: 10.1007/s12205-016-0705-0.
  18. [18] De Gruyter C, Currie G, Rose G. Sustainability measures of urban public transport in cities: A world review and focus on the Asia/Middle East Region. Sustainability 2016;9:43. DOI: 10.3390/su9010043.
  19. [19] Ramani TL, et al. Framework for sustainability assessment by transportation agencies. Journal of Transportation Research. 2011;2242:9–18. DOI: 10.3141/2242-02.
  20. [20] Van Lierop D, El-Geneidy A. Enjoying loyalty: The relationship between service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions in public transit. Research in Transportation Economics. 2016;59:50–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2016.04.001.
  21. [21] De Ona J, et al. Transit passengers’ behavioural intentions: The influence of service quality and customer satisfaction. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science. 2016;12:385–412. DOI: 10.1080/23249935.2016.1146365.
  22. [22] Van Lierop D, Badami MG, El-Geneidy AM. What influences satisfaction and loyalty in public transport? A review of the literature. Transp Reviews. 2018;38:52–72. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2017.1298683.
  23. [23] Santilli D, D’apuzzo M, Evangelisti A, Nicolosi V. Towards sustainability: New tools for planning urban pedestrian mobility. Sustainability. 2021;13:1–17. DOI: 10.3390/su13169371.
  24. [24] Moslem S, Stević Ž, Tanackov I, Pilla F. Sustainable development solutions of public transportation: An integrated IMF SWARA and Fuzzy Bonferroni operator. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2023;93(1):104530. DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2023.104530.
  25. [25] Khademi-Vidra A, Nemecz G, Mária Bakos I. Satisfaction measurement in the sustainable public transport of Budapest. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. 2024;23. DOI: 10.1016/j.trip.2023.100989.
  26. [26] De Oña J, De Oña R, Eboli L, Mazzulla G. Perceived service quality in bus transit service: A structural equation approach. Transport Policy. 2013;29:219–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.07.001.
  27. [27] Abdel Wahed Ahmed MM, Abd El Monem N. Sustainable and green transportation for better quality of life case study greater Cairo–Egypt. HBRC Journal. 2020;16:17–37. DOI: 10.1080/16874048.2020.1719340.
  28. [28] Goldmann K, Wessel J. Some people feel the rain, others just get wet: An analysis of regional differences in the effects of weather on cycling. Research in Transportation Business & Management. 2021;40:100541. DOI: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100541.
  29. [29] Eren E, Uz VE. A review on bike-sharing: The factors affecting bike-sharing demand. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2020;54:101882. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101882.
  30. [30] Schiller PL, Kenworthy J. An introduction to sustainable transportation: Policy, planning and implementation. Routledge; 2017.
  31. [31] Kennedy C, et al. The four pillars of sustainable urban transportation. Transportation Review. 2005;25:393–414. DOI: 10.1080/01441640500115835.
  32. [32] May AD. Urban transport and sustainability: The key challenges. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. 2013;7:170–85. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2013.710136.
  33. [33] Sarfraz M, Ivascu L, Abdullah MI. Editorial: Sustainable digital economy, entrepreneurship, and blockchain technology role in industrial-organizational psychology. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.974415.
  34. [34] Marius P, Trandabat D, Trandabat A. Assessment of corporate environmental performance based on fuzzy approach. APCBEE Procedia. 2013;5. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcbee.2013.05.063.
  35. [35] Coca LC, Pîslaru M. Inovation and productivity grouth in manufacturing industry-pharmaceutical company study case. The 18th Romanian Textiles and Leather Conference, 2023. DOI: 10.2478/9788367405133-055.
  36. [36] Alexa L, Pîslaru M, Avasilcăi S. From industry 4.0 to industry 5.0—an overview of European Union enterprises, Sustainability and Innovation in Manufacturing Enterprises. 2022. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-7365-8_8.
  37. [37] Trandabǎţ AF, Pîslaru M, Brînzilǎ M. SiadEnv - environmental friendly E-building energy management system. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal. 2012;11. DOI: 10.30638/eemj.2012.087.
  38. [38] Pislaru M, Herghiligiu IV, Robu IB. Corporate sustainable performance assessment based on fuzzy logic. Journal of Clean Production. 2019;223. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.130.
  39. [39] Vîlcu A, David I, Herghiligiu IV, Pîslaru M. Statistical methodology for the decision-making process in a company. The 18th Romanian Textiles and Leather Conference. 2023. DOI: 10.2478/9788367405133-062.
  40. [40] Yoo S, Lee J. Revising bus routes to improve access for the transport disadvantaged: A reinforcement learning approach. Journal of Public Transportation. 2023;25:100041. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubtr.2023.100041.
  41. [41] Manville M, Taylor BD, Blumenberg E. Falling transit ridership: California and southern California. UCLA: Institute of Transportation Studies. 2018.
  42. [42] Yeh CF, Lee MT. Effects of Taichung bus policy on ridership according to structural change analysis. Transportation. 2019;46:1–16. DOI: 10.1007/s11116-017-9778-y.
  43. [43] Murphy E, Usher J. The role of bicycle-sharing in the city: Analysis of the Irish experience. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. 2015;9:116–25. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2012.748855.
  44. [44] Campbell KB, Brakewood C. Sharing riders: How bikesharing impacts bus ridership in New York City. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2017;100:264–82. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.017.
  45. [45] Shaheen SA, Zhang H, Martin E, Guzman S. China’s Hangzhou public bicycle: Understanding early adoption and behavioral response to bikesharing. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2011;2247:33–41. DOI: 10.3141/2247-05.
  46. [46] Redman L, Friman M, Gärling T, Hartig T. Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: A research review. Transportation Policy. 2013;25:119–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.11.005.
  47. [47] Kuo YH, Leung JMY, Yan Y. Public transport for smart cities: Recent innovations and future challenges. European Journal of Operational Research. 2023;306:1001–26. DOI: 10.1016/J.EJOR.2022.06.057.
  48. [48] Dell’Olio L, Ibeas A, Cecin P. The quality of service desired by public transport users. Transportation Policy. 2011;18:217–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.08.005.
Show more

SPECIAL ISSUE CALL

Innovation and New Technologies in Transport and Logistics

Guest Editor: Eleonora Papadimitriou, PhD

Editors: Dario Babić, PhD; Marko Matulin, PhD; Marko Ševrović, PhD.

RECENT PAPERS

Browse through the selection of our recent research
Estimating Vehicle Turn-In Rate of Expressway Rest Areas via ETC Gantry Data – An ADPC-GMM ApproachCollege Students’ Cognition and Attitude Towards Connected and Autonomous Vehicles in China: an Exploratory StudyOptimising the Economic Feasibility of High-Speed Maglev Systems: A Simulation-Based Approach for Variable and Parameter AnalysisVehicle Trajectory Prediction Based on GAT and LSTM Networks in Urban Environments

Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science |
2024 © Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal