Let's Connect
Follow Us
Watch Us
(+385) 1 2380 262
journal.prometfpz.unizg.hr
Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal

Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science

Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science

PUBLISHED
06.02.2025
LICENSE
Copyright (c) 2025 Xin DOU, Xiaofeng PAN, Tao FENG

Investigating the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Travel Mode Choice Behaviour – A Stated Preference Case in Wuhan, China

Authors:Xin DOU, Xiaofeng PAN, Tao FENG

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on travel modes choice behaviour using a case study from Wuhan, China. A SP-experiment based survey was conducted in Wuhan, based on which an MNL model and a latent class MNL model were established, respectively. The model estimation results show the following conclusions. First, the attributes that are normally believed to significantly affect the residents’ travel mode choice behaviour turned out to be insignificant during the COVID-19 pandemic. Second, attributes such as age, gender, driving license, income trend, use frequency of public transit, currently most-frequent-used mode, household size, monthly household income, distance from metro station to home, number of confirmed/deaths cases, vaccination are significantly affecting the respondents’ travel preferences. Third, the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic leads to a decline in the residents’ preferences toward public transit, but the promotion of vaccines can lead residents to return to the public transit system. Fourth, the respondents were divided into three latent classes: high-susceptible, medium-susceptible and low-susceptible classes. These conclusions are believed to provide a reference for the investigation of impact of the COVID-19 pandemic or other similar public health events on the transportation system, and also offer supports for policy-making to effectively deal with such pandemics.

Keywords:travel mode choice, COVID-19 pandemic, MNL model, latent class, Wuhan city

References

  1. [1] Bai Y, et al. The next major emergent infectious disease: Reflections on vaccine emergency development strategies. Expert Review of Vaccines. 2022;471–481. DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2022.2027240.
  2. [2] Hua L. Wuhan has been to medium risk. CNR. http://www.cnr.cn/hubei/yaowen/20200326/t20200326525030415.shtml [Accessed 26th March 2020].
  3. [3] Ministry of Transport of China. Epidemic prevention measures. Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-04/14/content_5502337.htm [Accessed 11th April 2020].
  4. [4] Shen J, et al. Prevention and control of COVID-19 in public transportation: Experience from China. Environmental Pollution. 2020;266. DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115291.
  5. [5] Jiang N, et al. Transportation activity patterns of Chinese population during the COVID-19 epidemic. Research of Environmental Sciences. 2020;33(7):1675–1682. DOI:10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2020.06.16.
  6. [6] Beck MJ, Hensher DA. Insights into the impact of COVID-19 on household travel and activities in Australia – The early days under restrictions. Transport Policy. 2020;96:76–93. DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.07.001.
  7. [7] Basu R, Ferreira J. Sustainable mobility in auto-dominated Metro Boston: Challenges and opportunities post-COVID-19. Transport Policy. 2021;103:197–210. DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.01.006.
  8. [8] Stedman M, et al. A phased approach to unlocking during the COVID-19 pandemic—Lessons from trend analysis. International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2020;74(8):0–2. DOI:10.1111/ijcp.13528.
  9. [9] Aizaki H. Basic functions for supporting an implementation of choice experiments in R. JSS Journal of Statistical Software. 2012. DOI:10.18637/jss.v050.c02.
  10. [10] Train, Kenneth E. Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, 2009.
  11. [11] Greene WH, Hensher DA. A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: Contrasts with mixed logit. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 2003;37(8):681–698. DOI:10.1016/S0191-2615(02)00046-2.
  12. [12] Feng T, Arentze T, Timmermans H. Capturing preference heterogeneity of truck drivers’ route choice behavior with context effects using a latent class model. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research. 2013;13(4):259–273. DOI:10.18757/ejtir.2013.13.4.3004.
  13. [13] Croissant Y. Estimation of random utility models in R: The mlogit package. Journal of Statistical Software. 2020;95:1–41. DOI:10.18637/jss.v095.i11.
  14. [14] Hensher DA, Rose JM, Greene W. Applied choice analysis second edition. Cambridge University Press. 2015.
  15. [15] Hensher DA, Greene WH. Specification and estimation of the nested logit model: Alternative normalisations. Transportation Research Part B. 2002;36:1–17. DOI:10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00035-7.
  16. [16] Bucsky P. Modal share changes due to COVID-19: The case of Budapest. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. 2020;8. DOI:10.1016/j.trip.2020.100141.
  17. [17] Feng J. The influence of built environment on travel behavior of the elderly in urban China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2017;52:619–633. DOI:10.1016/j.trd.2016.11.003.
  18. [18] Cantwell M, Caulfield B, O’Mahony M. Examining the factors that impact public transport commuting satisfaction. Journal of Public Transportation. 2009;12(2). DOI:10.5038/2375-0901.12.2.1.
  19. [19] Dell’Olio L, Ibeas A, Cecin P. The quality of service desired by public transport users. Transport Policy. 2011;18(1):217–227. DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.08.005.
Show more


Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science |
2024 © Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal