Abstract
The main goal of this paper is to determine the main technical and technological criteria impacting the effectiveness of the synchronization of transport flows in the East-West Transport Corridor (EWTC) in the southern part of the Baltic Sea Region (BSR) corridor using a specific questionnaire. The results were processed using the Kendall rating correlation method, and the compatibility of the expert selection was analysed using a match factor. Following Kendall’s concordance coefficient and consistency ratio values, the expert opinions were reconciled. In the course of the research using the Average Rank Transformation into Weights (ARTIW) method, the normalized subjective weights of the main technical and technological impacting synchronization of transport flows were determined. The outcomes of the research presented in the paper have shown that the main technical criteria impacting synchronization are: railway infrastructure and road transport infrastructure at the terminals. The most important technological interaction criteria are accessibility of seaports and accessibility of railway distribution stations. In the following stages of research, the main criteria of the above two factors should be used to create models and facilitate synchronization with the purpose of building an interconnected transport system spanning all modes of transport.
References
Behdani B, Fan Y, Wiegmans B, Zuidwijk R. Multimodal Schedule Design for Synchromodal Freight Transport Systems. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research. 2016;(3): 424-444. Available from: doi:10.2139/ssrn.2438851 [Accessed 12th April 2019].
Dong C, Boute R, McKinnon A, Verelst M. Investigating synchromodality from a supply chain perspective. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2018;61: 42-57. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.trd.2017.05.011 [Accessed 12th April 2019].
Tavasszy LA, Behdani B, Konings R. Intermodality and Synchromodality. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2015;15. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2592888 [Accessed 12th July 2018].
Buiel EFT, Visschedijk GC, Lebesque LHEM, Lucassen IMPJ, Riessen B, van Rijn A, van Brake GM. Synchro mania-design and evaluation of a serious game creating a mind shift in transport planning. 46th International Simulation and Gaming Association Conference, ISAGA. 2015; p. 1-12. Available from: https://repository.tudelft.nl/view/tno/uuid:3c49819d-839e-4786-97db-c1ca02f606f3 [Accessed 22nd January 2019].
Logistiek T, Partituur naar de top. Adviesrapport Topteam Logistiek. 2011. Available from: http://www.infrasite.nl/documents/bedrijven/1889/Adviesrapport%20TopTeam% 20Logistiek%202011.pdf [Accessed 20th April 2019].
Norman BA, Rajgopal J, Lim J, Gorham K, Haidari L, Brown ST, Lee BY. Modular vaccine packaging increases packing efficiency. Vaccine. 2015;33(27): 3135-3141. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine. 2015.04.091 [Accessed 12th April 2019].
Defares D. Exploration of future container transport to and from the Dutch hinterland: Assessing the need for future policies. Master's thesis. Delft University of Technology; 2011. Available from: https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:a834577a-f4a34741-8185-267e51165566/datastream/OBJ [Accessed 28th April 2019].
Ceder A, Golany B, Tal O. Creating bus timetables with maximal synchronization. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2001;35(10): 913-928. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(00)00032-X [Accessed 12th April 2019].
Šakalys R, Sivilevičius H, Miliauskaitė L, Šakalys A. Investigation and evaluation of main criteria impacting synchromodality using ARTIW and AHP methods. Transport. 2019;34(3): 300-311.
Šakalys R, Batarlienė N. Research on intermodal terminal interaction in international transport corridors. Procedia Engineering. 2017;187: 281-288. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.376 [Accessed 12th April 2018].
Rodrigue JP. Globalization and the synchronization of transport terminal, Journal of Transport Geography. 1999;(7): 255-261.
Rodrigue JP, Notteboom T. Foreland–based regionalization: Integrating intermediate hubs with port hinterlands. Research in Transport Economics. 2010;27(1): 19-29.
Wilmsmeier G, Monios J, Lambert B. The directional development of intermodal freight corridors in relation to inland terminals. Journal of Transport Geography. 2011;(19): 1379-1386.
Limbourg S, Jourquin B. Optimal rail–road container terminal locations on the European network. Transportation Research Part E. 2009;(45): 551-563.
Vinke PJ. Dynamic consolidation decisions in a synchromodal environment: Improving the synchromodal control tower. Master's thesis. University of Twente; 2016. Available from: https://essay.utwente.nl/69109/1/Vinke_MA_BMS.pdf [Accessed 12th April 2019].
Kos S, Vukić L, Brčić D. Comparison of External Costs in Multimodal Container Transport Chain. Promet – Traffic&Transportation. 2017;29(2): 243-252. Available from: doi:10.7307/ptt.v29i2.2183 [Accessed 22nd May 2019].
Pomponi F, Fratocchi L, Tafuri RS. Trust Development and Horizontal Collaboration in Logistics: A Theory Based Evolutionary Framework. Supply Chain Management. 2015;20(1): 83-97. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-022014-0078 [Accessed 10th January 2019].
Veenstra A, Zuidwijk R, Van Asperen E. The extended gate concept for container terminals: Expanding the notion of dry ports. Maritime Economics & Logistics. 2012;14(1): 14-32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2011.15 [Accessed 10th January 2019].
Bontekoning YM, Macharis C, Trip JJ. Is a New Applied Transportation Research Field Emerging? Review of Intermodal Rail-Truck Freight Transport Literature. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2004;38(1): 1-34. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.tra.2003.06.001 [Accessed 22th April 2018].
Brümmerstedt K, Beek MV, Münsterberg T. Comparative analysis of synchromodality in major European seaports. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL–24), Nov 2017, Hamburg, Germany; 2017. p. 59-76. Available from: doi:10.15480/882.1477 [Accessed 22th April 2018].
via donau - Österreichische Wasserstraßen. Manual on Danube navigation. Vienna; 2013. 218 p. Available from: http://inesdanube.info/goto.php?target=file_1545_download&client_id=viailias4 [Accessed 22nd April 2018].
Alessandri A, Sacone S, Siri S. Modelling and optimal receding-horizon control of maritime container terminals. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Algorithms. 2007;6(1): 109-33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10852-006-9052-3 [Accessed 29th April 2019].
Nabais JL, Negenborn RR, Botto MA. Hierarchical model predictive control for optimizing intermodal container terminal operations. Proceedings of the 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013). The Hague, Netherlands; 2013. Available from: doi:10.1109/ITSC.2013.6728314 [Accessed 12th April 2019].
Jarašūnienė A, Greičiūnė L, Šakalys A. Research of competitive environment of Klaipėda Seaport comparing to other seaports in the eastern Baltic Sea region. Transport. 2012;27(1): 5-13. Available from: doi:10.3846/16484142.2012.662911 [Accessed 22nd April 2019].
TENTacle project 2019. Available from: http://www.tentacle.eu/a/uploads/dokument/TENTacle_report_final.pdf [Accessed 10th March 2019].
Kendall M. Rank correlation methods. 4th edition. London: Griffin and Co; 1970.
Kendall M, Gibbons JD. Rank correlation methods. Fifth edition. London; 1990.
Montgomery DC. Statistical Quality Control: A Modern Introduction. 7th edition. Arizona: John Willey and Sons. Inc.; 2013.
Sivilevičius H, Maskeliūnaitė L. Multiple Criteria Evaluation and the Inverse Hierarchy Model for Justifying the Choice of Rail Transport Mode. Promet – Traffic&Transportation. 2018;30(1): 57-69. Available from: doi:10.7307/ptt.v30i1.2417 [Accessed 10th March 2019].