Abstract
Port planning is complicated due to many factors, includingthe existence of economies of scale in port expansion andthe fact that ports operate under competition. The port plannershould provide an overview of all potential strategies to enhanceport competitivness. Choices should be made with tailoreddesign concepts within a framework comprising supply-demand planning and cost-benefit analysis. Port expansionis a strategy to enhance port competitiveness and can be characterizedas a stmctural port capacity measure. Non-structuralalternatives comprise supply and demand management measuresand aim at efficient capacity utilization. In the design ofport expansion, a certain level of traffic congestion should beaccepted. Full integration of port-commercial and public interestsby combining structural and non-structural capacity measuresis essential for planning of port capacity. Efficiency, themain guiding principle for such planning, addresses the simultaneousdetermination of 1) optimal expansion size, and 2) investmentrecovery period.References
Bovy, P. H. L. Traffic flooding the Low Countries: how
the Dutch cope with motorway congestion. Transport
Reviews, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 89-116,2001.
Dekker, S. Port Investment - Towards an Integrated
Planning of Port Capacity. PhD-thesis. TRAIUDelft
University ofTechnology, Delft, the Netherlands, 2005.
Drewry. North European Container Ports-A '$2 Billion
Plus' Industry Adapts to Change. Drewry Shipping Consultants
Ltd., London, U. K, 1999.
Mohring, H., and M. Harwitz. Highway Benefits- An
Analytical Framework. Northwestern University Press,
Evanston, Ulinois, U. S., 1962.
Paelinck, H. C., and J. H. P. Paelinck. Queuing Problems
and Optimal Design of Container Ports. Presented
at 37th Annual Meeting of the Western Regional Science
Association. Hyatt-Regency Montery, U. S., 1998.